Joseph Krist
Publisher
EV TAX BREAKS UPHELD
The Georgia Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal challenging the $5 billion project’s bond agreements with the state and the Joint Development Authority of Jasper, Morgan, Newton, and Walton counties (JDA). Rivian hopes to develop a $5 billion facility, expected to occupy 2,000 acres in the state, was announced in late 2021. The estimated production output the plant is 400,000 electric vehicles per year.
Construction on the site was originally set for 2022, which would have allowed operations to begin within two years, but due to a number of legal challenges, Rivian has moved the launch date back to 2026. The lawsuit before the Georgia Supreme Court claimed the state was not legally allowed to arrange the deal and challenged the validity of bonds tied to the offer.
A Michigan judge also declined to issue a preliminary injunction which would have suspend zoning ordinance changes supporting the Ford Motor Co. BlueOval Battery Park Michigan. The $3.5 billion, 2,000-acre plant will create about 2,500 jobs in the Marshall, MI area. Opponents filed a petition to call for a public vote on the matter but the city clerk deemed it insufficient.
That led the group to file the lawsuit on June 27, calling the clerk’s decision unconstitutional and arguing leaders violated the city charter when they tied an appropriation to the rezoning — which made it ineligible for a petition challenge. It asked for an injunction and for the court to order the city clerk to accept the petition.
NY TAX BREAK SCRUTINY
The Citizens Budget Commission (CBC) is a long-standing well-respected organization which analyzes the finances of New York City and State. Recently, it released the results of its analysis of economic development spending by the City and the State. The level of spending in the state has long been among the highest in the nation. The findings were not surprising but nonetheless disappointing.
CBC’s analysis of economic development spending in 2022 finds that: State economic development spending totaled nearly $4.4 billion, including $2.5 billion in foregone revenue from tax expenditures and $1.9 billion in direct spending; and local and county government spending cost $6.3 billion, including $3.1 billion in tax breaks, $2.1 billion in direct spending, and an additional $1.1 billion in foregone local sales tax revenue resulting from State sales tax exemption programs.
The cost of existing incentive programs is projected to increase by $500 million in 2023, a 22% increase from fiscal year 2022, and could increase by another $1 billion annually starting in 2024 as three new and expanded programs take effect: the expansion of the film tax credit increased the annual cap from $420 million to $700 million per year; the extension of the theatrical production increases the lifetime cap of the tax break by another $100 million to $300 million; Green CHIPS (a tax credit for the semiconductor industry) will increase expenditures as much as $500 million per year if fully utilized.
The biggest issue raised by the report is the lack of transparency which makes it very difficult to assess the effectiveness of the strategy overall and for discrete projects. This has created an environment where the State continues to expand existing incentives without evidence that they are necessary or cost-effective. In some cases, State officials have extended or expanded incentives despite independent evaluations showing that the credits are ineffective.
PA SEVERANCE TAXES
There have long been calls for Pennsylvania to adopt some form of severance taxes on the production of natural gas. The Commonwealth currently levies an “impact fee” which is levied on producers for each hole they drill. The fee has raised $2.5 billion since it was created in 2012. Many believe that use of the impact fee approach versus a severance tax has put the Commonwealth in the position of seeming to have left significant dollars on the table.
Now that debate is being revived in the Commonwealth legislature. The state House passed a resolution directing a nonpartisan committee to study severance tax structures in other major gas-producing states. The resolution directs the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a study to compare impact fees and severance taxes in the largest natural gas producing states and examine the competitive business climate for the industry in those states.
In 2022, Pennsylvania accounted for 19% of marketed natural gas production in the United States; and Pennsylvania’s marketed natural gas production was at an annual high of 20.9 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in 2021 and averaged 20.5 Bcf/d in 2022. The amount of gas produced increased from 1,066 billion cubic feet in 2011 to an estimated 7,600 in 2022. The resulting revenue income to the Commonwealth remained essentially flat.
The study is also charged with producing estimates of how much revenue was foregone due to the failure to levy a severance tax. This was the original goal of the supporters of the study. The original resolution focused on that potential revenue loss. The finished product evolved into a study of other factors such as permitting and even climate and their impact on production. This makes the study much more complicated and dilutes the focus on the lack of severance taxes and the potential revenue loss.
URBAN RECOVERIES
Much has been made of the slow recovery of many downtown business areas across the country. There have not been too many studies to produce data to reflect those realities. A recent effort by the University of Toronto has been able to generate an index of urban core recoveries that puts some real data behind people’s estimates and impressions.
The study looked at data derived from mobile phone use an increasingly widespread method of researching mobility. They are computed by counting the number of unique mobile phones in a city’s downtown area in a specified time period, and then dividing it by the number of unique visitors during the equivalent time period in 2019. For example, the March 2023 – May 2023 time period is compared to the March 2019 – May 2019 time period.
A recovery metric greater than 100% means that for the selected inputs, the mobile device activity increased relative to the comparison period. A value less than 100% means the opposite, that the city’s downtown has not recovered to pre-COVID activity levels.
While San Francisco remains the focus of much attention on its problems with its downtown recovery, the data shows that several other big American cities are coping with slow recoveries. San Francisco was ranked last with a 36% recovery. Other cities with recovery rates at or below 50% include Seattle, Boston, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Portland.
That is not to say that recoveries in the major cities outside that group have been great. Recovery rates for many big cities remain below 60%. That group includes Chicago, Nashville, Atlanta, Denver and Houston. Los Angeles and Miami have identical recovery rates of 65%. New York has recovered at a 67% rate which is the same as San Antonio. Washington, D.C. has complained about remote policies for federal employees but the recovery rate there is actually 75%.
The survey found only four cities had reached a recovery rate of 100% or higher. The best large city recovery rate was found in Salt Lake City at 139%. El Paso showed a 107% recovery rate.
MORE PURPLE LINE DELAYS
The State of Maryland and Purple Line Transit Partners are seeking Board of Public Works approval of a modification to the Purple Line Public-Private Partnership Agreement that extends the contractual deadline for achieving Revenue Service Availability to Spring 2027. The schedule change reflects delays in completion of utility relocation activities. The project is more than 50% complete.
In addition to the extension of the project’s Revenue Service Availability deadline, the Maryland Transit Administration will provide net compensation to Purple Line Transit Partners of $148 million, including an increase of $205 million paid during the construction period, less a $57 million reduction to payments made during the operations and maintenance period. The compensation amount reflects the additional cost of continuing construction activities during the extended period.
OH, CANADA
In November, voters in Maine will cast a ballot on a referendum question on whether to disenfranchise the state’s two largest privately-owned electric utilities to create a consumer-owned utility called Pine Tree Power. If Maine residents were to vote in favor of creating a consumer-based electricity utility, it would likely stimulate negotiation. An elected board of directors would also be formed to manage the Pine Tree Power Company.
One of those electricity companies which would be impacted by a vote in favor of the referendum is Versant Power. Here’s where things get tricky. Versant is currently owned by Enmax after a deal valued at $1.8 billion was completed in 2020. Enmax is the electric utility serving and owned by the City of Calgary, Alberta. Yes, a publicly owned utility. That is what makes its position on the referendum a bit of a tangle. To date, it has spent some $7.5 million opposing the referendum.
What is it that this municipal utility in Canada dislikes about the deal? “A government-controlled utility company is a risk Mainers can’t afford.” So says the Enmax funded advocacy group. It’s turning into a bit of a “through the looking glass” experience. It will also highlight the role in several areas of foreign-owned transmission and distribution utilities which have acquired these systems as outlets for their own sources of power.
Those efforts have accompanied a pattern of poor service and underinvestment in the physical grid components those forms maintain. While that underinvestment continues, dividends continue to be upstreamed to foreign parents. Opponents of the operations of Enmax estimate that since Enmax’s acquisition of Versant Power in 2020, it has sent Enmax a yearly dividend which then is revenue to the City of Calgary. It is estimated that Calgary received $82 million from Enmax.
MTA FARE INCREASE
The potential imposition of congestion fees on drivers coming into Manhattan has dominated much of the discussion about the need for increased revenues at New York’s MTA. The focus on that topic has allowed the Authority to consider a fare increase even though the return to pre-pandemic utilization levels has not occurred. Now, the M.T.A.’s board voted to raise the base fare for subway and bus trips for the first time in eight years, to $2.90 from $2.75, by late August.
Weekday ridership has rebounded significantly but still hovers at about 70 percent of pre-pandemic levels. The $2.75 base fare has been in place since 2015. The most recent fare increase came in 2019, when the price of unlimited weekly and monthly MetroCards rose. The board also voted to increase tolls on bridges and tunnels next month by 6 percent for drivers paying through the E-ZPass system and by 10 percent for those who pay by mail.
The increases come after the NYS budget was adopted which granted increased state revenue to the MTA. The state’s funding package includes a $65 million payment earmarked to prevent an even larger fare increase to help make up for the one that was skipped in 2021. The additional aid also creates an environment where discounts and/or exemptions can be considered by the Commission generating toll recommendations.
MORE HOSPITAL PRESSURE
Nuvance Health (Nuvance) operates seven hospital campuses: Vassar Brothers Hospital, Putnam Hospital, Northern Dutchess, Danbury Hospital, New Milford Hospital, Norwalk Hospital, Sharon Hospital and three Medical groups in Eastern New York and Western Connecticut. It reported $2.6 billion revenue in FY 2022. Like so many other systems, it faces higher labor costs while utilization has not fully returned to pre-pandemic levels.
This puts pressure on profitability as well as liquidity. Results have been poor enough so that Moody’s anticipates that Nuvance will breach its debt service coverage covenant at the end of fiscal year 2023. Given the current trends, Moody’s downgraded Nuvance Health’s revenue bond rating to Baa3 from Baa2. The rating outlook was maintained at negative.
The outlook reflects the fact that stabilization of the system’s finances will require the success of management at addressing the cost side of the problem. That will be hard as the trends driving costs are national rather than regional or site specific. The generation of a larger “customer” base through service expansions cannot be counted on to generate short term liquidity improvement.
MICHIGAN MUNI SOLAR POWER
Michigan’s state capitol, Lansing, has announced a significant bond-financed plan to expand its generation of renewable energy. The Lansing Board of Water & Light (BWL) has been at the front of the climate debate having closed its last coal-fired generating facility. Now, the Board said it plans broad-ranging investments in solar, wind and at least one new gas-fired electric generation plant in a $750 million plan over the next 10 years. The combined increase in new capacity would be 650 MW. The utility currently can generate around 735 megawatts of electricity.
BWL board members approved rate increases for water and electric last fall, raising electricity rates 9% and water prices more than 18% over a two-year period. About half of those increases took effect Nov. 1 and the other half will take effect this fall. Currently, the utility does own some of its own solar capacity but most of its solar power is purchased. The plan is specific about proposed investment in new solar and wind assets.
The plan provides for the possibility of an additional natural gas-fired peaking plant. BWL just added to its natural gas fleet in 2022. The lack of real specificity about the development of the natural gas capacity gives the Board time to evaluate the political climate for a gas plant and whether it would still be feasible.
Disclaimer: The opinions and statements expressed in this column are solely those of the author, who is solely responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this column. The opinions and statements expressed on this website are for informational purposes only, and are not intended to provide investment advice or guidance in any way and do not represent a solicitation to buy, sell or hold any of the securities mentioned. Opinions and statements expressed reflect only the view or judgment of the author(s) at the time of publication, and are subject to change without notice. Information has been derived from sources deemed to be reliable, but the reliability of which is not guaranteed. Readers are encouraged to obtain official statements and other disclosure documents on their own and/or to consult with their own investment professional and advisors prior to making any investment decisions.