Joseph Krist

Publisher

ANOTHER PATH TO GAS BANS

The City of Cambridge, MA has become the first known city in the country to mandate non-residential buildings to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions with a net zero requirement by 2035 for large buildings (larger than 100,000 square feet) and 2050 for mid-size buildings (100,000 square feet or smaller). The City is doing this through amendments to its building codes – the Building Energy Use Disclosure Ordinance (BEUDO) – first passed in 2014.

That established code requirements for energy and water reporting from commercial properties over 25,000 square feet and residential properties over 50 units. This ordinance regulates approximately 1,100 buildings in Cambridge. It has been suggested that the use of building codes to effect changes in use for things like gas stoves is a more effective way of withstanding legal challenges. The Berkeley, CA ordinance against natural gas appliances specifically has not fared well in court to date. That litigation has led to suspension or postponement of enforcement of similar ordinances in other municipalities.

This week, Eugene OR repealed its ban on new natural gas appliances that was enacted only this past February. The City Council cited opposition to the ban and the court decision invalidating Berkeley, CA ban on natural gas hookups.

CARBON CAPTURE AND LOCAL REGULATION

Summit Carbon Solutions and an owner of an ethanol plant in Shelby County, Iowa have obtained a preliminary injunction against the County to keep it from regulating the location of proposed carbon capture pipelines. The lawsuits seek declarations that the ordinances are preempted by federal and state regulations, permanent injunctions that prevent their enforcement and attorney fees.

The ruling in the federal Southern District of Iowa, said state law does not explicitly prohibit the Shelby County ordinance in western Iowa but that such a prohibition is implied. The judge found that the ordinance’s requirements for pipeline companies to submit safety plans to the county and to notify the county when use of a pipeline is discontinued conflict with federal rules. She noted that the County would have a role in land restoration under state law and the lack of explicit reference to the County’s right to regulate is evidence that “the Legislature did not envision a role for counties in regulating the location of pipelines,”.

In two other companion lawsuits against Emmet and Story counties, motions for preliminary injunctions remain under review.  The Iowa Utilities Board is poised to start a final evidentiary hearing for Summit’s project on August 22. 

GEORGIA TRANSIT FUNDING

Georgia voters in 2020 passed a constitutional amendment requiring all revenues that the state’s dedicated trust funds collect to remain inside those programs rather than be diverted into the general budget. To implement the will of the voters, nine trust funds were created by the Legislature in 2021. One is The Transit Trust Fund which gets its dedicated revenue from a per-ride tax on ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft.

The Transit Trust Fund Program (TTFP) is administered by GDOT and uses a population-based formula, based on 2020 Census data, to distribute state funding to Georgia’s counties with existing transit service. The first full fiscal year of results indicate that Georgia public transit systems are getting about $27 million. Half of that is split between MARTA and ATL the main transit providers in Atlanta. The rest aids smaller systems throughout the state. The awards have to be spent on new services, instead of ongoing operations.

NUCLEAR AND TAXES

Back in 2021, the Byron Nuclear Power Station in Illinois was chosen for closure. The price of its power was not competitive in its market. As the closure date approached, the Illinois Legislature passed bills providing some $700 million in operating subsidies to keep the plants open. In terms of the climate, it was a positive development given the carbon-free nature of nuclear generations. In terms of policy and politics, positive is likely in the eyes of the beholder. 

Byron Generating Station’s two nuclear reactors can produce up to 2,347 megawatts (MW) of zero-emissions energy. Byron Generating Station Unit 1 is licensed through 2044, and Unit 2 is licensed through 2046. Now that the issue of operation is out of the way for the foreseeable future, the plant’s owners – Constellation Energy – have come to an agreement over the taxation of the plant for the next five tax years. Constellation will pay more than $33 million in property taxes, over half of which will go to the host school district.

The rest will be distributed to eleven other local municipalities and districts. The plant will retain an assessed value of $500 million through the term of the agreement.

CLEAN ENERGY JOBS

Clean energy jobs include jobs in the technologies related to renewable energy; grid technologies and storage; traditional electricity transmission and distribution for electricity; nuclear energy; a subset of energy efficiency that does not involve fossil fuel burning equipment; biofuels; and plug-in hybrid, battery electric, and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and components.

The U.S. Energy and Employment Report (USEER) is a comprehensive summary of national and state-level energy jobs, reporting by industry, technology, and region with data on unionization rates, demographics, and employer perspectives on growth and hiring.  Recently, it published its 2023 USEER. It shows that the energy workforce added almost 300,000 jobs from 2021 to 2022 (+3.8% growth), outpacing the growth rate of the overall U.S. workforce, which grew by 3.1%. Clean energy jobs increased in every state and grew 3.9% nationally.

As of 2022, the energy sector has recovered 71% of the jobs lost in 2020.3 The energy sector has added back 596,000 of the 840,000 jobs lost during the first year of the pandemic. Nuclear electric power generation employment increased by 1,358 jobs in 2022, up 2.4% from 2021, whereas it had decreased the previous year. Employment increased and decreased across different categories of fossil energy for electric power generation. Coal electric power generation jobs decreased by 6,780 from 2021 to 2022, down 9.6%, while natural gas electric power generation jobs increased by 7,311, a growth rate of 6.6%. Oil electric power generation employment increased by 2.4%, adding 279 jobs in 2022.

Where are those jobs? Energy jobs grew in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., with the largest growth in Texas, California, and Pennsylvania. Clean energy jobs grew across all 50 states and D.C. Excluding traditional transmission and distribution, California added 13,116 jobs (+3.6%), followed by Texas, which added 5,198 (+5.5%), and New York, which added 5,054 (+3.0%). When including transmission and distribution jobs, California added 13,293 (+3.2%), followed by West Virginia, which added 6,975 (+19%), and Texas, which added 5,136 (+3.5%).

ESG – EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ARE A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD

The idea of executive action when the legislative process and/or the judiciary system do not provide the answers one wants is gaining increased currency. The SCOTUS recent decisions on student loan debt and affirmative action have increased calls for executive action. It is good to remember that the use of executive action can easily be a two-edged sword.

The ESG space is the latest source of pressure to act via executive action. Those who oppose the concept have been hard at work in the most recent legislative sessions in efforts to legislate against the use ESG. The last two years have seen a spate of such legislation enacted. Fourteen states have enacted at least one law designed to limit the use of ESG principles in making investment decisions and/or awarding business. This year there were proposed some 165 pieces of legislation in 37 states to counter ESG investment practices, according to Pleiades Strategy, a climate-focused research and advisory firm. But of those 165 proposals, only 22 anti-ESG laws in 16 states were approved this year.

That is not fast enough to satisfy ideologues holding state office. The latest example is Missouri. Missouri is one of ten states which assign the regulation of the securities industry to the State secretary of State. Missouri’s Republican secretary of state, John “Jay” Ashcroft, issued a rule on June 1 that requires broker-dealers to obtain consent from customers to purchase or sell an investment product based on social or other nonfinancial objectives, such as combating climate change. (Yes, Mr. Ashcroft is the son of the man who ran for Senate and lost to a dead man).

Republican lawmakers failed to pass a similar measure during the state’s legislative session that ended on May 12. The Secretary is now going to try to accomplish through regulation what could not be accomplished legislatively. It is the first step in a process to rely on executive or administrative orders and attorney general opinions. In Wyoming, Secretary of State Chuck Gray has proposed ESG disclosure rules for investment advisers like Missouri’s. A public comment period is expected soon.

SENIOR LIVING BLUES

We were recently asked to look at current conditions in the senior living sector of the municipal market. The sector has been experiencing increasing defaults and it stands out as one of the weakest credit sectors in the market. We see several reasons for that.

COVID – The sector clearly came under attack during the pandemic especially in 2021. COVID clearly has impacted the view of senior living on the part of consumers and families alike. So now the attractiveness of one of these facilities will be diminished for some time. That is the first demand driver.

Interest Rates – Then there is the impact of inflation/higher interest rates. The stickiness being observed in the housing market generally is both a supply issue as well as an access to capital issue. Now that younger people are effectively priced out of housing ownership, the model of selling granny’s house to pay the entrance fee doesn’t work as well. If trends against traditional zoning laws continue, the attractiveness of turning the garage into an accessible living space for a senior will only increase.

Refinance Restrictions – The days of multiple refundings to adjust debt service schedules as problems arise is diminished. Only able to refund once and only on a current basis, a borrower has a much more limited menu of options to deal with cash shortfalls. This will show up in more defaults but supported by the willingness of lenders to hold back on covenant enforcement.

Inflation – Just like hospitals, they have gotten creamed by higher costs for supplies, utilities, and labor. Labor is especially hard to find so by definition becomes more costly.

Size matters – While hospitals face many of the same issues, the larger established facilities in that sector had more resources and larger revenue bases to rely on to tide them through. Those that were smaller did not do so well. Many of the senior living credits are site specific so the flexibility which one might hope to find is limited by the relatively smaller resource base supporting those credits.

GAINESVILLE UTILITIES TAKEOVER AND GOVERNANCE

A non-profit and a group of citizens has filed a lawsuit in the Florida courts challenging the State’s takeover of the local utilities authority in Gainesville. (MCN 7.10.23) The move by Governor DeSantis to politicize the operations of GRU should raise issues for investors who care about governance issues. The first issue reflects the fact that while the authority will be a unit of Gainesville city government, the City Commission will not control or direct it.

The plaintiffs in the litigation are actually suing on the basis of free speech grounds. The law says the authority “shall consider only pecuniary factors and utility industry best practices standards, which do not include consideration of the furtherance of social, political or ideological interests.” The plaintiffs note that members of the public in the past have petitioned the City Commission on issues such as “rates and services for low-income people and social issues such as environmental safety, racial fairness in infrastructure and living wages for GRU (Gainesville Regional Utilities) employees.”

The plaintiffs contend that the new ‘law eliminates plaintiffs’ and others’ rights to petition the board for redress of grievances pertaining to social, political, environmental, and ideological issues that are inherent in the operation of a utility system,” the lawsuit said. “Even if the authority allowed plaintiffs or others to address them with respect to ‘social, political, or ideological interests,’ the authority is legally prohibited from taking any action in response.”

CYBERSECURITY

A federal grand jury has indicted an individual, charging him with intentionally causing damage to a protected computer after he allegedly accessed the computer network for the Discovery Bay Water Treatment Facility, located in the Town of Discovery Bay, Calif., and intentionally uninstalled the main operational and monitoring system for the water treatment plant and then turned off the servers running those systems. The individual was an employee of a private company which operates the plant.

It was a serious breach. It is alleged that the individual installed software on his own personal computer and on his employers private internal network that allowed him to gain remote access to Discovery Bay’s Water Treatment facility computer network. Then, in January of 2021, after the individual had resigned from the private operator, he allegedly accessed the facility’s computer system remotely and transmitted a command to uninstall software that was the main hub of the facility’s computer network and that protected the entire water treatment system, including water pressure, filtration, and chemical levels.

MUNI BONDS FOR SOLAR

The Sandoval County, New Mexico Commission approved a resolution that would issue $275 million in Industrial Revenue Bonds that would go to building an 1,100-acre solar farm. The bonds would be paid from revenues derived under a Payment In Lieu of Taxes agreement from the owner. The power is expected to be sold to existing and projected data centers supporting companies like Intel and Facebook.

The use of PILOT payments continues to facilitate a wide range of development including sports facilities and projects like this. The County has issued PILOT debt before so it is a tested concept. The PILOTs will be divided by the County and the five school districts located in it. The five school districts receive a total of 38% and Sandoval County receives 62% of the PILOT payment. Rio Rancho would get 22.64% of the PILOT payments. Cuba would get 7.27%, Jemez Valley 4.64%, Bernalillo 3.20% and Corrales would get 0.11%.

SPORTS FACILITIES AND REALITY

This week, two situations involving sports facilities in New York and Oakland highlight the complicated relationship that cities have with sports teams. Over the years we have seen a variety of responses which serve to undermine the position of those who believe that subsidies for facilities for professional sports teams a bad investment. The two situations serve to highlight the idea that actions speak louder than words.

This week, the New York City Independent Budget Office (IBO) released an analysis of the cost/benefit of a tax exemption granted to the owners of Madison Square Garden (MSG). Madison Square Garden is the city’s oldest operating professional sports arena and the only major league sports facility located in Manhattan, sitting directly above Penn Station, the busiest transit hub in North America.

The MSG arena opened at its current location in 1968 and hosts two professional teams—the New York Knicks and the New York Rangers. As a private property, the arena paid property taxes until the 1982 New York State Legislature exempted MSG indefinitely.  Local Law 18 passed by the City Council in 2017, turned to IBO to issue periodic evaluations of the city’s economic development tax expenditure programs. The new report finds that since the property tax exemption took effect, MSG has been exempted from paying more than $946.7 million in property taxes, as measured in 2023 dollars.

IBO concludes that it is unlikely that the property tax exemption for MSG is the determining factor for the Knicks and Rangers maintaining their location in New York City. Potential relocation options for the Knicks and Rangers are limited by current market saturation within the leagues and the economic benefits of MSG’s current location (which affect ticket and broadcasting revenues for the stadium) are strong.

The first arena special permit was issued in 1963 for a term of 50 years, expiring in 2013. The City Council chose to renew the permit in 2013 but restricted it to a length of 10 years, leading to the current expiration in July 2023. One might expect a tough negotiation with MSG especially given the efforts to renovate and expand Penn Station. The City Planning Commission has proposed letting MSG have its permit renewed if the Garden cooperates with renovations to Penn Station. Those plans would replace a theater in one part of MSG. Now, the City Council may balk at the agreement but there seems to be no real threat to the Garden operating at its current location.

In Oakland, the City is making a last-ditch effort to prevent the Oakland A’s from moving to Las Vegas. The proposal comes after the A’s entered into a deal with Bally’s Corp. to build a stadium on part of the Tropicana Las Vegas resort site and received approval from the Nevada Legislature for about $380 million in public funding. Now after years of fighting the notion of subsidies for the City’s last remaining pro sports franchises, a proposal has been made.

The city said it secured more than $425 million in funding to cover offsite infrastructure costs, $65 million more than the A’s requested. The team would pay for onsite infrastructure and development, but the city would reimburse about $500 million of that cost through the creation of an infrastructure financing district.

The irony is that the City’s proposal would locate the stadium where the A’s wanted in the Howard Terminal industrial site. The new Mayor who took office in January is pursuing a different path than that of her predecessor. The depth of support for any public funding from the City has always been an issue. The combined expenditure of nearly $1 billion by the City runs against the mantra of scarce resources for public services being gobbled up by a for profit entity that has been put out there for many years.

So, one has to ask oneself exactly which view actually has currency – public funding or no public funding?

NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

NYCHA has been in the news for its state of disrepair and overwhelming need for capital. A lack of federal funding support has not helped but the quality of management at the Authority has been a sore point for some time. The Authority’s chief executive is in turmoil. Multiple administrations have found funding needed repairs in amounts anywhere close enough to cover what was an estimated $41 billion capital need to properly maintain the existing stock have not materialized.

We say was because the Authority released a new estimate for the cost of funding repairs to NYCHA’s buildings. The new estimate released this week puts the price tag at $78 billion. NYCHA officials estimate that $60 billion relates to things that will need replacement in the next five years — including boilers and heating systems. The new estimate is the first developed while NYCHA operates under a federal monitor.

Eighteen months into the Adams administration, the Mayor’s plan to privatize management of the Authority creeps along. This would facilitate the provision of public housing through the private sector. Politically, the plan has many opponents including residents who would see their housing demolished to facilitate new housing. It is an idea first hatched in the Bloomberg administration and it did not get far under Mayor DeBlasio.

The sheer scale of NYCHA’s portfolio makes it matter. NYCHA’s developments are home to more than 330,000 people, disbursed through 2,100 buildings. Rents for public housing residents tend to be capped at 30 percent of their income, and the average rent is less than $560 per month. NYCHA estimates that 40% of the families living in NYCHA homes have at least one person who is working. Nearly 275,000 families were on the waiting list for a NYCHA apartment this year.

Disclaimer:  The opinions and statements expressed in this column are solely those of the author, who is solely responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this column.  The opinions and statements expressed on this website are for informational purposes only, and are not intended to provide investment advice or guidance in any way and do not represent a solicitation to buy, sell or hold any of the securities mentioned.  Opinions and statements expressed reflect only the view or judgment of the author(s) at the time of publication, and are subject to change without notice.  Information has been derived from sources deemed to be reliable, but the reliability of which is not guaranteed.  Readers are encouraged to obtain official statements and other disclosure documents on their own and/or to consult with their own investment professional and advisors prior to making any investment decisions.