Joseph Krist

Publisher

This is our year end 2022 review and outlook. We return with the issue dated January 9, 2023.

TRANSPARENCY

The Financial Disclosure Transparency Act passed the House. It would mandate that financial information from municipal bond issuers be presented in a machine readable form among other provisions. What it does not do is contribute to an increase in timeliness and data quality. Just because a format is selected does not mean that all of the data will be magically improved. The requirements would likely be a nightmare for smaller issuers resulting in increased costs with little discernable benefit to those issuers. It seems to be a benefit for data managers and distributors especially for those who will be developing and peddling software.

No one wants to go back to the days of contacting issuers and financial officers when information was closely held. When information was inconsistent or did not meet what might have been simple common sense inquiries. Now we are moving to an even more quantitative market where the data may be in a uniform format but is not additive to the analytic process. It will do nothing to aid the effort to assess and interpret data by analysts. As for the non-financial information which often drives credit and valuation decisions, this proposal does nothing to improve or enhance that process. This will be especially true for many enterprise backed revenue credits.

This is not like previous efforts to improve disclosure like rule 15c2-12 which did increase the volume of information. It does not offer a clear improvement to individual investors in terms of credit analysis. It continues to drive the market towards greater commoditization of the municipal market. In the end, it diminishes the role of credit in the investment process. A uniform data language does not improve the quality of project information whether it be the monitoring of construction progress or review of interim financial data. It does not address issues of law and policy which can be just as important to credit evaluation as numbers.

We generally support efforts aimed at increasing the quality, volume, and timeliness of financial disclosure in the municipal bond market. This is not one of them.

Many thought that the 2022 mid-term elections would generate results which might establish a clear background for next year’s events. The results were anything but. The euphoria over a Senate majority has given way to the reality of a very tenuous majority in the Senate let alone a House majority for the other party. Already, we are seeing the types of activities which have historically been used by more extreme members to weaken Republican speakers. The result is likely to be effective legislative gridlock which severely limits the potential for any serious legislation.

That should effectively end the vast flow of federal cash to the states and localities. It will be important to remember that the fiscal year beginning in June is the last year that states and localities can rely on outside money to fund programs that have been increased or established during the pandemic period. This will be a phenomenon which will be repeated across the country but there will be some prominent credits to watch as they begin to deal with the beginning of the end of federal largesse.

California benefitted greatly from federal pandemic assistance but its finances are already showing signs of a different outlook going forward in the near-term. In late November, the Legislative Analyst’s Office laid out a case for the entire $25 billion surplus the state has accumulated being offset by an emerging revenue shortfall. Already legislative proposals are being advanced which assume that a large surplus will be available to fund spending – income support, transit projects, homelessness – all have their advocates but no source of funding.

New York State saw increases in spending which were to be expected given the state’s pivotal role in the pandemic and its lingering effects and the realities of its political landscape. Now the State finds itself being the first state to deal with an FY 2024 budget. It does so in the face of an uncertain outlook for its finance and real estate industries. It is clear that the state’s recovery – especially that of NYC – has been slower than expected. It has been a bit of time since the current legislative leadership has had to deal with something other than divvying up other people’s money. The legislature is no longer veto-proof which will make the annual three people in a room setting characteristic of NYS budget making much more difficult.

New York City will try to continue to expand housing, maintain pre-K for all, repair the capital stock of the Housing Authority, address the crisis of mentally ill homeless in the face of an uncertain local economy and declining outside aid. The indicators are so mixed so far that one would be foolish to make assumptions about the future. Office occupancies still lag. Excess space remains on the market – both commercial office and retail. Attendance at the city’s schools continues to be below pre-pandemic levels and it is estimated that some 250,000 have permanently moved out. Tourism remains uncertain. Several Broadway shows have closed shortly after reopenings after the pandemic.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has already begun the process of imposing a fare increase. The basic problem is simple. Passengers do not wish to see an increase in fares. The current image of the subways is that of slow service, unsafe facilities, turnstile jumping, and an overall breakdown of the environment. The heavy reliance on congestion fees in future plans relies on the success of that program. As much as any agency, the MTA relies on both the state and city government for funding which gives suburban legislators inordinate power.

It becomes clearer each day that new funding is needed and that is in addition to what congestion pricing yields. Unfortunately, MTA funding has been one of the preeminent battlegrounds in the state legislature. The City will face its own revenue needs and will not be a ready source of additional operating cash. Meanwhile, the dance in the press which accompanies any process of raising fares has begun. It also comes at a time when experiments with free service have begun in several major cities. The results to date have been mixed. Riders and transit advocates have pointed to service deficiencies playing as much a role in demand as fares. This has led to an underwhelming reaction in some places to these programs.

HEALTHCARE

It may be only two years ago that federal aid was bailing out hospital credits, mitigating some of the concerns about the damage done to hospital balance sheets. Since then, the virus may have ebbed but inflation has not. Hospitals seem to be one of the hardest hit sectors by inflation. Whether it be supply shortages or prices or labor costs, hospitals bore the brunt of the pandemic’s effects. In the aftermath of the pandemic, hospitals saw declines in non-emergency healthcare which help to extend the damage to finances.

One sector which was under siege before the pandemic was the rural hospital sector. Once the pandemic hit, rural hospitals were at the front line of COVID care as the only providers of emergency services. Now, many of those facilities are still at risk in the wake of the pandemic and hoping for outside help primarily from the federal government. Over 180 rural hospitals have closed in the United States since 2005. Ten percent of those closed in 2020.

A program is being offered by the federal government which would designate facilities as “rural emergency facilities.” Rural emergency facilities could receive monthly payments of $272,866, with increases based on inflation each year. They will also receive higher Medicare reimbursements than larger hospitals. There is one catch. They must promise to release patients to larger facilities within 24 hours. It would mean an end to inpatient treatment at those facilities. Not even for labor and delivery patients.

On the other side of the coin, the hospitals which are supposed to pick up the rural slack have their own problems. Consolidation had slowed during the pandemic but its aftermath is reviving mergers in the face of pressured finances. Volumes continue to be impacted as patients remain fearful of hospitals and hospital type environments especially at large facilities. This has impacted elective care and procedures which are often substantial profit contributors for hospitals.

The large metropolitan hospitals still face pandemic issues. Significant issues with COVID and RSV are both taxing to the facilities’ bottom lines but they revive the aforementioned fears holding down utilization. The situation is highlighted by revived masking requirements in Los Angeles and New York. Hospitals in those places are combating higher costs and supply shortages without additional governmental support.

PRIVATE COLLEGES

Private colleges have been on a downward trajectory in recent years as increasing tuition caused sticker shock and the pandemic limited access. The National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) conducts annual surveys of tuition rates across the country. The 2021 study showed that net tuition revenue per undergraduate increased year-over-year but is still down two percent from five years ago, after adjusting for inflation. Enrollment was relatively flat overall, as an increase in first-year students was diluted by a decrease in enrollment among other undergraduates. This occurs before the full effects of a pending unfavorable turn in demographics which is expected to reduce applications and matriculations through the decade.

To combat the trend, the smaller private institutions have embarked on a campaign to publicize the “true” cost of attendance. Most undergraduate students at these institutions received grant aid this year, and the awards were, on average, the largest they’ve ever been. In AY 2021-22, 82.5 percent of all undergraduates at institutions surveyed received aid, which covered an average of 60.7 percent of published tuition and fees. Ironically, the higher sticker prices may actually drive down demand for a given school.

POWER

The electric power sector remains the most interesting as it is at the center of nearly every contentious issue associated with climate change. Municipal utilities across the country are on the front line of the response whether it be generation development and siting; hydroelectricity vs. fish; equity – economic and environmental; refurbishment and expansion of the transmission and distribution grid. Municipal utilities are in a position to make pivotal decisions.

Coal vs. natural gas – the potential for Memphis to truly change the game will grow throughout the year as it decides whether or not to renew a long-term contract with the TVA. If a customer which accounts for 10% of TVA’s load demand turns away over environmental concerns, it could lead the TVA to reconsider its plans to replace coal with natural gas.

Nuclear – Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS) is a participant in a proposed small scale nuclear project. Small scale nuclear has hit some speed bumps lately as inflation has raised cost estimates. Nonetheless, utilities in the southeast have announced plans to deploy small modular nuclear in Virginia. A plant has also been proposed for the Hanford site in Washington. These plants will be in the news all year as the regulatory processes unfold.

One risk has already emerged and impacted development. The private developer of an advanced nuclear reactor proposed for southwestern Wyoming recently announced a two-year delay in the project. The issue is not with planning, record keeping, or poor construction management as has been the case with so many legacy nuclear reactors. Here the issue is a lack of the more highly enriched fuel the plant requires.

The primary (and often only) source of the fuel is Russia. This will require the development of a domestic source of fuel. Until that is resolved construction makes no sense.  The planned project site is currently the home of two operating coal units at electric utility PacifiCorp’s Naughton Power Plant. This project could repurpose the site as both units are slated to retire in 2025.

Transmission – This is the issue which is as much of a near-term obstacle to full electrification as anything else. Projects like the Grain Belt Express and the Central Maine transmission line remained mired in legal challenges and environmental concerns. Transmission – its capacity as well as its ability to accept new power – is simply inadequate to satisfy the goals of advocates. The imbalance between capacity and supplies is a real issue. It has slowed connections for solar and both residential as well as industrial scale. 

Electrification – The move to electrify the nation physically and economically is exposing so many conflicts on the road to this goal. Lithium is the key component in the process of manufacturing batteries to power electric cars. The effort to fully develop a domestic lithium industry is now running headlong into a gauntlet of environmental and cultural concerns. Numerous proposed mining sites are being challenged on environmental and religious grounds. That process will play out throughout the year. The trend of restricting natural gas use in new construction will continue. This will continue to conflict with natural gas proponents who are a large number even at the public agencies.

Disclaimer:  The opinions and statements expressed in this column are solely those of the author, who is solely responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this column.  The opinions and statements expressed on this website are for informational purposes only, and are not intended to provide investment advice or guidance in any way and do not represent a solicitation to buy, sell or hold any of the securities mentioned.  Opinions and statements expressed reflect only the view or judgment of the author(s) at the time of publication, and are subject to change without notice.  Information has been derived from sources deemed to be reliable, but the reliability of which is not guaranteed.  Readers are encouraged to obtain official statements and other disclosure documents on their own and/or to consult with their own investment professional and advisors prior to making any investment decisions.